The Massachusetts Court has been vilified and praised to the skies. This is one of the difficult situations in which ethics systems of determining right from wrong , morality formal sets of values and principles declaring what is right and wrong and law legislated mandates declaring what a society will and will not permit are all pulling in different directions, and the courts have to sort things out. The initial challenge is an ethical one. Gay couples want the same rights as heterosexual couples, and by classic reciprocity principles, this is something all citizens can understand:.
Collaborative Mind Maps & Flow Charts
Of Sexual Irregularities by Jeremy Bentham – review | Philosophy books | The Guardian
A s he lay dying in the spring of , the great philosopher Jeremy Bentham left detailed directions for the preservation of his corpse. First, it was to be publicly dissected in front of an invited audience. Then, the preserved head and skeleton were to be reassembled, clothed, and displayed "in the attitude in which I am sitting when engaged in thought and writing". His desire to be preserved forever was a political statement. As the foremost secular thinker of his time, he wanted to use his body, as he had his mind, to defy religious superstitions and advance real, scientific knowledge. Nowadays Bentham is hardly a household name. Yet his ideas have proved extraordinarily influential in law, economics, philosophy and politics.
Of Sexual Irregularities by Jeremy Bentham – review
Debates over gay marriage involve both legal and social arguments, for and against. Legal arguments on behalf of gay marriage tend to get more attention because it should be a matter of basic civil and equal rights. Yet, it's not demonstrable that gay marriage is harmful. On the contrary, there are good reasons to think that legalized gay marriage can benefit us all. Studies repeatedly demonstrate that people who marry tend to be better off financially, emotionally, psychologically, and even medically.